HealthTalx Forum Forum Index » Cancer News » Scientists create anti-cancer cells
Page 1 of 1
| Author | Message | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
altyfcJoined: 27 Jul 2004 Location: Aardvarkland Posted: Wed Oct 12, 2005 8:24 pm |
University of Minnesota researchers have turned embryonic stem cells into cancer-fighting cells in the lab.
|
|||
iRuleThisForumJoined: 23 Jul 2004 Posted: Wed Oct 12, 2005 9:13 pm |
altyfc wrote:Using one of the federally approved embryonic stem cell lines, scientists first coaxed the cells to turn into blood cells, including “natural killer cells.” These naturally occurring cells produce proteins that attack tumors. Politics heavily influenced by religious groups is getting in the way. |
|||
altyfcJoined: 27 Jul 2004 Location: Aardvarkland Posted: Thu Oct 13, 2005 9:34 pm |
I wonder what "federally approved" actually means... what are they approving exactly?
|
|||
iRuleThisForumJoined: 23 Jul 2004 Posted: Thu Oct 13, 2005 10:11 pm |
altyfc wrote:I wonder what "federally approved" actually means... what are they approving exactly?
Aaron ... a bit complicated. Policy debate in the U.S. Origins of debate In 1995, Congress passed the Dickey Amendment, prohibiting federal funding of research that involves the use of a human embryo. Privately funded research led to the breakthrough that made embryonic stem cell research possible in 1998, prompting the Clinton Administration to develop federal regulations for its funding. Preparations for this funding were completed in 2001. President George W. Bush announced, on August 11, 2001 that federal funds could be used to support research on the newly developed field of human embryonic stem cells, but that funding would be limited to "existing (embryonic) stem cell lines where the 'life-and-death decision' has already been made". This limitation does not apply to research involving stem cells from other sources, such as umbilical cord blood, placentas, and adult and animal tissues. Some conservative religious groups felt the restrictions should have been stronger, while some scientists felt frustrated with the restrictions. In 2002, President Bush appointed the Council on Bioethics, an advisory group composed of 18 doctors, legal and ethical scholars, scientists and a journalist. In February 2004, Bush removed from the council two advocates of embryonic stem cell research, professor of ethics William May and biologist Elizabeth Blackburn. In their place, he appointed pediatric neurosurgeon Dr. Benjamin Carson, political scientist Dr. Diana Schaub, and professor of government Dr. Peter Lawler, all of whom have a more cautious point of view toward embryonic stem cell research. All of the Council members support adult stem cell research. Some scientists are concerned that embryonic stem cell research has become a politicized issue instead of a scientific issue in the national mindset, and feel that the politicization distorts representation of the scientific issues. Private funding The Bush administration's decision does not prohibit private embryonic stem cell research. Pharmaceutical companies and biotechnology companies initially expressed little interest because they consider therapies based on cells, which might have to be tailored to each patient, to be less profitable than one-size-fits-all drugs. However, there are start-up biotechs entering the field. They include StemCells Inc. and Aastrom Biosciences. Others are reluctant to enter the market because they fear government restrictions preventing them from capitalizing on the research. However, private research groups (such as pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies) are now financing individual medical treatments, including all of those mentioned in this article. The document was originally published at Wikipedia and the document is licensed under GNU Free Document License. If you'd like to find out more about Embryonic stem cell, you might be interested in visiting this page in Wikipedia. |
|||
| Topics | Replies | Author | Views | Last Post | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Related topics | |||||
![]() |
One puff of smoke damages DNA, what about air pollution? | 19 | iRuleThisForum | 5090 | Thu Sep 06, 2007 7:54 am cpvr |
![]() |
Help is defined by one who receives it | 6 | iRuleThisForum | 2414 | Tue Jan 16, 2007 9:41 am iRuleThisForum |
![]() |
Extended contributor page, would you like to see one or not? | 6 | iRuleThisForum | 2752 | Thu Sep 23, 2004 10:57 am iRuleThisForum |
![]() |
One for iRule! | 2 | Thais | 1664 | Fri Sep 10, 2004 10:35 pm iRuleThisForum |
![]() |
One of possible applications of cloning | 0 | iRuleThisForum | 1759 | Tue Aug 03, 2004 5:59 am iRuleThisForum |





